Always Blame the Farmers!

Theoretically speaking, ideal policymakers could use a variety of technological, social, and economic strategies, such as those outlined in my earlier posts, to strike a balance between water shortage and food security. However, when it comes to realistic water resource conservation, small-scale irrigational farming is frequently blamed and farmers' interests are often neglected. In this post, I would like to discuss the tensions between traditional smallholder irrigation and other stakeholders in Tanzania to examine farmers' dilemmas in the face of regional water shortage.

Located in Tanzania's southwest, the Great Ruaha River (GRR) is a significant watershed of the Rufiji River. GRR has a drainage area of roughly 68,000 km2 and is critical to agriculture output and national hydropower generation (Baur et al., 2000), as well as delivering water to over 6 million people (Lankford et al., 2009). The majority of riparian residents work in agriculture, and there are three primary irrigation systems in use: self-sustaining traditional smallholder farming, enhanced traditional smallholder farming with government or donor assistance, and contemporary large-scale projects (e.g., the Kapunga and Mbarali rice farms; England, 2019).

The GRR has a highly seasonal and spatially unequal rainfall pattern, with upstream highlands receiving much more annual rainfall than downstream flatlands (Baur et al., 2000). Rainfall is concentrated during the wet season, which usually lasts from December to April. With the reduction of river flows in the mid-1970s, the basin witnessed significant hydrological changes. The appearance of no-flows events in 1993 has considerably heightened public awareness of hydrological changes in the basin and the conflict of interest between upstream farmers and downstream stakeholders, since GRR used to be perennial (Walsh, 2012).

The Mtera Dam in Tanzania. Source: AllAfrica.

Water allocation has been a hydro-political balancing act for the local administration ever since. On the one hand, promoting upstream agriculture can assist in maintaining farmers’ vote, while on the other hand, avoiding downstream hydropower generating failure can help avoid related economic penalties and obtain support from the powerful hydroelectricity industry.

Apart from various factors such as climate change, land-use changes, and mismanagement in the hydropower system being raised by academia (Kashaigili, 2008; Kangalawe et al., 2011; Walsh, 2012), the mainstream option held by local stakeholders is blaming upstream traditional smallholder irrigation as the greatest causalities for hydrological change in GRR. In a 2017 interview-based research, all of the GRR actors blamed the reducing dry season river flow on the increase in the area and water-use inefficiency of smallholder irrigation schemes, which generally mirrors the current sanctioned narrative.

When taking actor self-interest into account, understanding why conventional smallholder irrigation is blamed would be easier (England, 2019). Smallholders provide a handy scapegoat for MEM and Tanesco (Tanzania's national ministry and company responsible for hydropower generating) to divert attention away from their poor hydropower system operation and help them target their energy generation objectives. Blaming smallholders is also convenient for the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor (a public-private partnership) in advocating for the modernisation of traditional irrigation schemes and meeting their ambitious irrigation expansion targets. These actors frequently argue, in concert with other powerful stakeholders in the basin, for a restriction on water extraction for upstream traditional smallholder irrigation.

Small-scale farmers drip irrigation systems in Tanzania. Source: SCOUTS.

Under such a social environment, the Rufiji Basin IWRMD Plan clearly asks for a pause in irrigation area expansion until the efficiency is improved. The Rufiji Basin Water Office has also ceased granting dry season water abstraction licences, leaving a lot of farmers without legal access to water. Politicians also often utilise the water permit system as a vote-getter. A handful of ward councillors would indirectly encourage farmers without permissions to "opportunistically irrigate" before election years in order to consolidate votes (England, 2019).

Miserably, water resource management in GRR is more concerned with political vote-buying and appeasement of strong stakeholders, rather than with determining who actually needs water and how to maximise water resource efficiency. Future researches should be conducted without the goal of appeasing partisan and self-interests, in order to gain a better understanding of the actual causes of hydrological change and the best solution for the basin's future.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Food and Water in Africa: Start with a More Careful View

图片
Hi and welcome to my blog! This blog will include a series of posts to discuss some key issues and potential solutions relating to the topic of Food and Water in the African context. In this first post, I would like to start with some reflections about how should we view water and food issues in this continent. Almost undeniably, water and food are two essential preconditions of life, which are also strongly interlinked. Only with sufficient quantity and acceptable quality of water, food security could be achieved to support other economic and social development within a country  (Vilakazi et al., 2019) . In other words, water is incontestably embedded in food safety.  In terms of water and food in Africa, you probably have seen or known the following statements before:      Over 600 million Africans are experiencing water shortages.       Nearly one-fifth of the African population is suffering from hunger  (FAO, 2021) .    ...
阅读全文

Virtual Water Trade: Economic Solution towards Agriculture-led Water Scarcity

图片
As I suggested in my last post , building reservoirs or other forms of water storage facilities could aid in adjusting seasonal imbalances of water resource allocation. Following that, let's talk about another creative solution to the uneven spatial distribution of water. Virtual Water: The Theory Since its inception in the early 1990s, the virtual water trade has grown in popularity as a special solution to national water scarcity. The term "virtual water" relates to the water required to manufacture certain agricultural products (sometimes also further applies to water used in non-agriculture items). This proposal came up with a technique for countries to compensate for their water shortages through economic processes. Instead of producing water-intensive commodities in-house, countries could choose to import them and spare their limited water resources for domestic consumption. On the other hand, water-rich nations can also benefit from their surplus water resource by...
阅读全文

GMOs: Changing the Crop Africans Grow

图片
In the previous two posts, I addressed two solutions to Africa's water and food scarcity challenges: correcting unequal time distribution of water resources through storage systems and easing asymmetrical geographical distribution via virtual water trade . Both of these ideas stem from the desire to make better use of current water supplies – but what if we could address the problem by changing the crops we grow? As an outcome of modern biotechnological development, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have always been burdened with both expectations and opprobrium. GMOs, according to the FAO , are species 'in which one or more genes have been introduced into its genetic material from another organism using recombinant DNA technology. This approach allows for the development of crop traits (such as disease resistance, lower water and nutrient input requirements, higher yield and nutrition and so on) that may adapt to a broader range of growing environments, hence addressing f...
阅读全文